Industry
AI visibility for law firms
People research legal questions with assistants long before they contact a firm. The sources cited during that research shape who they eventually call.
Legal is a high-caution, high-authority category. Assistants avoid giving legal advice, so they answer informationally and cite sources they consider reliable — bar associations, courts, established firms with credentialed authors. That makes attorney-authored educational content unusually valuable, and jurisdiction specificity a genuine advantage.
What makes this hard
The specific problems this creates — not generic advice about “the AI era”.
Assistants deflect rather than recommend
Most decline to recommend specific counsel, answering generally and suggesting you consult a lawyer. Visibility comes from being the cited source, not the recommendation.
Jurisdiction gets flattened
Law varies by state and country; assistants often answer generically. Explicit jurisdiction signals are how you avoid being lumped into a wrong-jurisdiction answer.
Directories dominate local prompts
Avvo, FindLaw and similar are cited heavily for 'find a lawyer' queries, sitting between you and the client.
The questions your buyers are actually asking
Procedural and cost prompts are where firms win. They're the questions prospective clients are too embarrassed to ask a lawyer directly — which is exactly why they ask an assistant.
- “What are my rights if [common legal situation]?”
- “How much does a [practice area] lawyer cost?”
- “Do I need a lawyer for [situation], or can I handle it myself?”
- “What's the process for [legal procedure] in [jurisdiction]?”
- “How do I choose a [practice area] attorney?”
Replace the bracketed terms with your own. Every one of these returns a different answer depending on which assistant you ask.
What to measure
The metrics that matter for this work, and why each one earns its place on a dashboard.
Citation on practice-area questions
Whether assistants cite your content for the areas you practise.
Jurisdiction accuracy
Whether answers correctly reflect the law where you practise.
Directory competition
Which legal directories assistants cite instead of firm sites.
Attorney credential signals
Whether bar admissions and author credentials are parseable.
How AEOVisor helps
The parts of the product that do the work described above.
Practice-area prompt tracking
Monitor the informational questions prospective clients actually ask, and see which sources assistants cite for each.
Schema validation for firms
Validate LegalService, Attorney and Organization markup, including jurisdiction and credential signals.
Competitor and directory analysis
See which firms and directories are being cited in your practice areas and jurisdictions.
Legal: common questions
Practical answers, including where this is genuinely hard
Rarely — most avoid recommending specific counsel. The winnable goal is being the source cited when someone researches their situation, because that's what puts your firm in front of them at the point of need.
Other industries
SaaS
Software buying starts with a question — 'what's the best tool for X'. Increasingly that question goes to an assistant, and the shortlist it returns is the shortlist that gets evaluated.
Read moreE‑commerce
Shoppers now ask assistants what to buy. Product recommendations are becoming a discovery channel of their own — one with no ad auction and no obvious way to buy your way in.
Read moreHealthcare
Health questions are the most consequential thing people ask assistants — and the most heavily filtered. Being cited requires demonstrable authority, not marketing.
Read moreFinancial services
People ask assistants which card, account or provider to choose. Those answers are shaped by affiliate-funded comparison sites — and by whether your own content is authoritative enough to compete with them.
Read moreEducation
Prospective students research programmes with assistants — and increasingly use them to compare institutions, costs and outcomes before ever visiting a website.
Read more